How to confiscate
Russian assets?
Transparency International Ukraine and Ukrainska Pravda created a special platform with all the information about the confiscation of (pro-)russian assets in Ukraine: the mechanisms, the names of russian henchmen, and their assets that were seized. UAH 25,926,283,615.19 from seized property (except confiscation in criminal cases) was transferred to the budget.
Map confiscated property
Number of objects:
1662
Vinnytsia region
Luhansk region
Kharkiv region
Cherkasy region
Lviv region
Donetsk region
Real estate - 8
Transport - 1
Corporate rights and shares - 6
Kyiv and Kyiv region
32233588.41 ₴
Real estate - 6
Corporate rights and shares - 2991
Values and works of art - 537
Odesa region
Real estate - 1
Zaporizhzhia region
Real estate - 17
Corporate rights and shares - 7
Autonomous Republic of Crimea
Real estate - 33
Transport - 8
Corporate rights and shares - 5
Dnipropetrovsk region
Real estate - 4
Transport - 11
Corporate rights and shares - 2
Kherson region
Real estate - 7
Corporate rights and shares - 1
Zhytomyr region
Corporate rights and shares - 1
Mykolaiv region
Real estate - 24
Transport - 250
Corporate rights and shares - 6
Sumy region
Real estate - 21
Corporate rights and shares - 1
0 шт.
103
 шт.
Corporate rights of companies
0
355
Transport units
0
290
Real estate objects
0
937
Valuables and works of art
Mechanism #1
Confiscation is carried out based on the Law on Improving the Effectiveness of Sanctions on the Assets of Individuals No. 7194
Stages of confiscation
Risks
How to offset them?
Management

Stages of confiscation:

1. The NSDC blocks the assets of a person by its decision. The President puts its decision into effect by a decree and deprives the person of the right to dispose of the assets.

2. The Ministry of Justice prepares a statement to the HACC on the application of a sanction to the person in the form of confiscation of assets.

3. The Anti-Corruption Court considers the application within 30 days from the date of its receipt.

4. After the decision is adopted by the court of first instance, it can be appealed with the HACC Appeals Chamber (HACC AP). It must begin to consider the complaint within 15 days from the date of receipt of the complaint.

5. If the Appeals Chamber confirms the decision of the HACC on the confiscation of assets, then such assets are transferred to the management of the SPFU.

Risks:

1. Possible appealing of the confiscation to international authorities due to non-compliance with international standards. In particular, the terms for submitting a withdrawal and an appeal are too short.

2.  Potential recognition of the HACC as unconstitutional in accordance with Article 125 of the Constitution, which provides that the judiciary in Ukraine is built on the principles of territoriality and specialization and is determined by law.

3. The mechanism cannot be applied to the assets of persons who were sanctioned in the form of blocking of assets before the entry into force of the updated Law “On Sanctions” (24.05.2022). Such assets must be “re-blocked.”

4. Circumvention of sanctions is not criminalized in Ukraine.

How to offset them?

1. To provide due process rights to all participants in the case. In particular, to extend the terms for submitting a withdrawal and an appeal against the decision of the first instance.

2. Consider the possibility of authorizing the administrative court to hear sanction cases instead of the HACC.

3. Provide that the confiscation mechanism can be applied to assets that were blocked even before the entry into force of the updated law.

All listed assets are transferred to the management of the SPFU.

Where confiscated funds can go:

Fund for the Liquidation of the Consequences of Armed Aggression of russia. As of July 31, 2023, UAH 114,110,900 has been transferred to the Fund.

Alexey Chernyak
Member of the state duma, faction of the all-russian political party united russia
Decision of the HACC — February 27, 2023
Anatoly Aksakov
Member of the state duma of russia, member of the political party a just russia – for truth
Decision of the HACC — February 6, 2023
Anatoly Torkunov
Rector of Moscow’s State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia (MGIMO)
Decision of the HACC — December 14, 2022
Andrey Falaleev
Rector of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Decision of the HACC – December 5, 2022
Arkady and Igor Rotenberg
Russian entrepreneurs, oligarchs
Decision of the HACC — March 20, 2023
Boris Paykin
Member of the russian state duma from the LDPR
Decision of the HACC — January 13, 2023
Ekaterina Martyanova
deputy head of the so-called "public chamber of the Donetsk People's Republic"
Konstantin Bakharev
The so-called member of the russian state duma from the united russia party
Decision of the HACC — December 31, 2022
Leonid Babashov
Member of the state duma, member of the political party united russia
Decision of the HACC — March 24, 2023
Mikhail Shelkov
Russian entrepreneur, oligarch
Decision of the HACC — January 23, 2023, decision of the HACC AC — February 3, 2023
Oleg Deripaska
Russian entrepreneur, oligarch
Decision of the HACC — February 16, 2023. Decision of the HACC AC — 16.06.2023
Oleg Polukhin
Rector of the Belgorod State National Research University
Decision of the HACC — December 9, 2022
Olga Kovitidi
Member of the federation council of russia from the so-called executive power of the "Republic of Crimea"
Decision of the HACC — December 30, 2022
PJSC "Moscow Exchange MICEX-RTS
Decision of the HACC — April 19, 2023
Roman Lyabikhov
Member of the russian state duma from the CRPF
Decision of the HACC — January 12, 2023
Sergey Kolbin
Member of the federation council of russia, senator of russia
Decision of the HACC — January 30, 2023
Sergey Tsekov
Member of the federation council of russia from the so-called "Republic of Crimea." Member of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs
Decision of the HACC — May 19, 2023
Viktor Yanukovych
Former President of Ukraine (2010-2014), guilty of high treason
Decision of the HACC — December 14, 2022, Decision of the HACC AC — January 4, 2023
Vladimir Yevtushenkov
Russian entrepreneur, oligarch.
Decision of the HACC — September 1, 2022, Decision of the HACC — October 3, 2023
Volodymyr Saldo
Former mayor of Kherson, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — May 9, 2023, Decision of the HACC AC — May 17, 2023, Decision of the HACC — November 10, 2023
Yevgeni Giner
Russian entrepreneur, president of JSC Professional Football Club CSKA
Decision of the HACC — February 27, 2023
OJSC Ilyushin Aviation Complex
Decision of the HACC — June 27, 2023, Decision of the HACC — December 4, 2023
Artemy Lebedev
Russian designer and propagandist
Decision of the HACC — July 10, 2023
Dmytro Vorona
Member of the Federation Council of Russia; since December 20, 2022 — a representative of the illegally annexed Zaporizhzhia Oblast. In February 2022, he was appointed advisor to Serhii Aksionov, the so-called head of Crimea.
Decision of the HACC — July 31, 2023
Sergey Kalashnik
Russian entrepreneur, member of the federation council of russia
Decision of the HACC — August 10, 2023
Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Belarus
Decision of the HACC — August 22, 2023
LSR Group
confiscated assets are related to Russian oligarch Molchanov
Decision of the HACC — August 22, 2023
Volga-Dnepr Group
International group of cargo companies for complex logistics services. Before the beginning and during the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, it systematically contributed to the armed aggression of Russia
Decision of the HACC — August 29, 2023
PJSC "Rostvertol" named after B. M. Slyusar
One of the key enterprises of the Russian military-industrial complex, which produces helicopters for occupying groups, in particular Mi helicopters
Decision of the HACC — September 3, 2023
Eduard Khudaynatov
Owner of "Independent Oil and Gas Company"
Decision of the HACC — January 26, 2024
Ivan Savvidi
Russian entrepreneur
Decision of the HACC — February 9, 2024
Serhiy Cherevko
Former deputy mayor of Kherson, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — February 21, 2024
Ihor Semenchev
Member of the Kherson City Council, 8th convocation, Block of Volodymyr Saldo Party, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — February 21, 2024
Georgiy Kalenov
Former leader of the Kherson regional organization of the pro-Russian party "Russian Edinstvo", collaborator
Decision of the HACC — February 21, 2024
Vladimir Leontiev
Gauleiter of Novaya Kakhovka, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — February 21, 2024
Dmitry Kiselyov
Russian propagandist
Decision of the HACC — March 4, 2024
Svetlana Gizay
The so-called “member of the People’s Council of the LPR”
Decision of the HACC — March 15, 2024
Rostislav Shvets (Metropolitan Lazar)
Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church at rest, since 1992 he headed the Simferopol and Crimean Metropolies
Decision of the HACC — April 4, 2024
Dmytro Tabachnyk
Former Minister of Education of Ukraine during Yanukovych's time, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — April 10, 2024
Vyacheslav Boguslaev
ex-president of JSC "Motor Sich"
Decision of the HACC — April 18, 2024 and December 2, 2024
Petro Kononenko
ex-representative of JSC Motor-Sich in Moscow
Decision of the HACC — April 18, 2024
Evgeny Balytskyi
Former People's Deputy, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — April 23, 2024
JSC Ilyushyn Finance Co.
Decision of the HACC — May 15, 2024
JSC Scientific and Production Corporation "Design Bureau of Mechanical Engineering"
Decision of the HACC — April 18, 2024
Aleksandr Verkhovsky
Russian oligarch, a member of the Council of the Federation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation from 2012 to 2017
Decision of the HACC — May 28, 2024
ROYAL PAY EUROPE LLC
a company whose beneficiary is Sergei Kondratenko, a Russian citizen connected to the Russian bookmaker 1XBET
Decision of the HACC — May 28, 2024
Yurii Abisov
co-head of the Regional Branch of the All-Russian People's Front in the temporarily occupied Crimea
Decision of the HACC — July 30, 2024
Vladimir Bobryshev and Gennadiy Harkusha
collaborators who took positions in Russia's self-proclaimed "main department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Kherson region"
Decision of the HACC — July 29, 2024
JSC "Nevskaya Cosmetics"
a Russian enterprise that had control over the "Vinnytsiapobuthim" plant
Decision of the HACC — July 24, 2024
Nataliia Paschenko
holds the position of the so-called "Minister of Health of the People's Republic of China"
Decision of the HACC — August 6, 2024
Nataliia Desiatova
A collaborator who, after the occupation of Kherson, became the illegal director of one of the local art museums.
Decision of the HACC — August 20, 2024
Igor and Arkady Rotenberg, Oleksandr Skorobogatko and Oleksandr Ponomarenko
Russian oligarchs and businessmen close to Putin
Decision of the HACC — September 4, 2024
Myron Horilovskyi, Valentin Buyanovskyi and Andrii Menshov
Russian businessmen, owners of "Polyplastik Group" - the largest Russian producer of polymer pipes and composite polymer materials
Decision of the HACC — September 20, 2024
Alisher Usmanov, Vladimir Streshinsky and the Skoch family
Alisher Usmanov is a Russian oligarch who, together with his partners, has business in strategic sectors for the Russian economy - in metallurgy and mining, the telecommunications sector, and the field of digital technologies.
Decision of the HACC — September 25, 2024
Mikhail Shelkov, PJSC "VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation"
Russian businessman, oligarch. The owner of the metallurgical company VSMPO-AVISMA Corporation PJSC, the world's largest producer of titanium.
Decision of the HACC — September 30, 2024
Taisiia Povalii
a singer of Ukrainian origin who defected to Russia after the full-scale invasion
Decision of the HACC — October 10, 2024
JSC "HMS Group", Vladimir Lukyanenko senior and junior, Herman Tsoi
Russian businessmen, owners of the machine-building holding JSC "HMS Group"
Decision of the HACC — October 29, 2024
Yury Kot
Russian showman-propagandist
Decision of the HACC — December 25, 2024
Viacheslav Zanevskyi
former head of Yanukovych's security, collaborator
Decision of the HACC — February 5, 2025
Oleksandr Kuzmenko
collaborator, the so-called "Minister of Culture of the Kherson Region."
Decision of the HACC — February 19, 2025
Mechanism #2
Confiscation is carried out on the basis of the Law on Forced Seizure of Property of russia and Its Residents No. 2116-IX
Stages of confiscation
Risks
How to offset them?
Management

Stages of confiscation:

1. The Cabinet of Ministers prepares a draft decision on the forced seizure of property rights of russia and its residents and submits it to the National Security and Defense Council.

2. The NSDC decides to forcibly seize a number of objects of property rights in Ukraine, after which the President of Ukraine signs a decree that puts this decision into effect.

3. No later than 6 months from the date of the end of martial law, the Verkhovna Rada shall approve the decree of the President by the relevant law.

4. Subsequently, the objects of property rights are seized and transferred to economic management on a temporary or permanent basis or to the management of specialized state enterprises, institutions, organizations, and business associations, in whose authorized capital more than 50% of the shares (stakes) are owned by the state.

5. The ownership of the seized objects is registered in the person of the Cabinet of Ministers on the part of Ukraine.

Risks:

1. Non-compliance with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The law does not contain any mechanism for protecting the rights of legal entities (for example, through a legal process) whose property will be seized. This could potentially constitute a violation of Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to an effective remedy.

2. Contesting the law in the Constitutional Court. The law provides for the seizure of objects of property rights without any compensation, which is contrary to Article 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine.

How to offset them?

Provide for a judicial or administrative process for the seizure of property.

Transferred for management:

Assets of banks — to the Deposit Guarantee Fund, Ministry of Finance, SE National Investment Fund.

Where confiscated funds can go:

The Fund for the Liquidation of the Consequences of Armed Aggression of russia. It has been transferred to the Fund:

– In 2023 — UAH 8,811,502,122.91;

– In 2022 — UAH 17,000,670,592.28.

Confiscated assets
under mechanism #2
Joint Commercial Industrial Investment Bank PJSC
International Reserve Bank
Mechanism #3
Confiscation within the framework of criminal proceedings is one of the types of penalties provided for by the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
Stages of confiscation
Risks
Management

It is used only in combination with the main punishment: deprivation of liberty, arrest or correctional labor (for serious and especially serious acquisitive crimes, as well as for crimes against the foundations of national security of Ukraine and public security, regardless of their severity).

Stages of confiscation:

1. The verdict on the person comes into force.

2. The court appeals to the State Executive Service with a letter for the enforcement of the verdict.

3. Property is confiscated into the property of the state.

Risks:

1. The expiration of the terms of prosecution, and therefore the impossibility of applying punishment in the form of confiscation of property.

2. Speed. Criminal proceedings may continue for years.

In this case, the assets are transferred to the management of the Asset Recovery and Management Agency (ARMA). However, for the assets to be transferred to the ARMA, they must meet three criteria:

– such assets are recognized as material evidence in criminal proceedings;

– they are worth more than 200 subsistence minimums for able-bodied persons;

– they can be transferred to the National Agency with the written consent of the owner, and in case of its absence — by a court decision.

At the same time, in case of lifting the seizure or closure of criminal proceedings, the management of the seized property is terminated.

Where confiscated funds can go:

To the state budget.

According to the data received from the State Judicial Administration for 2022, in 1,282 criminal proceedings, a decision was adopted to apply confiscation in the amount of UAH 160,463.95. Including:

– in cases of crimes against the foundations of national security: 102 (of which 85 — for high treason);

– in cases of crimes against public security: 56 (of which 41 — on creation of a terrorist group or terrorist organization);

– in cases of crimes against peace, human security, and the international legal order: 4.

 We may assume that these cases are related to Russian aggression against Ukraine, but we do not have the opportunity to know their essence for sure. Neither is the information on which assets were confiscated within these proceedings available.

Mechanism #4
Nationalization of banks through the procedure of withdrawal from the market under Law 3111-IX
Stages of confiscation
Risks
Management

Stages of confiscation:

1. The NBU decides to withdraw a systemically important bank from the market.

2. The NBU submits a proposal for the participation of the state represented by the Ministry of  Finance of Ukraine in the withdrawal of a systemically important bank from the market.

3. The Cabinet of Ministers adopts an appropriate decision.

4. The Cabinet of Ministers concludes an agreement on the acquisition of the bank for UAH 1 with the Deposit Guarantee Fund.

5. The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine becomes the corporate rights’ management body for the bank’s shares.

6. The bank becomes the property of the state.

Risks:

Potential appeal of nationalization of banks to international authorities due to non-compliance with international standards.

The bank becomes the property of the state and is managed by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine.

However, after the end of martial law, it is planned that the Ministry of Finance should sell the bank to private investors.

JSC Sense Bank
Monetary assets were confiscated
from Russian oligarchs
0
16315632.7
0
236804841.07
Our experts
Andrii Borovyk
Executive Director of Transparency International Ukraine
Kateryna Ryzhenko
Deputy Director for Legal Affairs of Transparency International Ukraine
Nataliia Sichevliuk
Legal Advisor at Transparency International Ukraine
Pavlo Demchuk
Legal Advisor at Transparency International Ukraine
This material was prepared with the financial support of the European Union. Its content is the sole responsibility of Transparency International Ukraine and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union.